Sunday 15 November 2026 - 09:15
Failure of Washington’s Pressure to Close Iran’s Land Borders

The New York Times reported that, following the failure to advance a military option against Iran, the Trump administration has attempted to close Iran’s land borders by pressuring Turkey, Iraq, and Pakistan an effort that has been met with resistance from Tehran’s neighbors.

Hawzah News Agency- According to the report, three Iraqi officials and one American official who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter confirmed that U.S. officials have spent the past few weeks attempting, through diplomatic channels, to compel Iran’s neighbors to close their border crossings. These efforts, however, have so far proven unsuccessful.

the U.S. military announced the formation of a special unit dubbed "Task Force Iron Gate." The mission is reportedly aimed at preventing the transfer of advanced weapons systems, dual-use technologies, sanctioned materials, and illicit financial resources across Iran’s land borders and the Caspian Sea.

Nevertheless, it remains unclear how this task force will operate in practice. According to The New York Times, utilizing the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) to advance an economic and security campaign is an unusual move. Some former military officials and analysts believe that Washington intends to leverage CENTCOM’s intelligence capabilities and resources which were previously focused on Iran during the conflict to carry out this mission. The mission could entail coordination among diplomats, anti-money laundering bodies, and intelligence agencies.

A U.S. military official stated that this task force consists of approximately 20 military and civilian personnel and is based in Florida. According to the official, the unit is not intended to conduct military operations itself; rather, it may encourage neighboring countries to deploy their own military forces to counter illicit trade and the movement of goods subject to sanctions.

Dana Stroul, a former senior official for Middle East affairs at the U.S. Department of Defense during the Biden administration, described this move as a strategy to employ all available tools to increase pressure on Iran. She noted that Washington is seeking to block all routes Iran uses to circumvent sanctions and mitigate the impact of a maritime blockade.

The New York Times reports that, among Iran’s neighbors, Iraq finds itself in a particularly difficult position. Iraqi officials are concerned that blocking land routes along the 994-mile border with Iran could trigger unrest in the border region, as Baghdad does not exercise full control over this rugged frontier. Washington, desperate to destroy Iran’s economy, claims that Iran uses the Iraqi border to transport weapons and financial resources to regional resistance groups. However, U.S. officials have acknowledged that neighboring countries are concerned about the domestic repercussions of closing routes that are vital to the livelihoods of local populations and the operations of businesses on both sides of the border. A U.S. official stated that these nations fear that blocking such routes could lead to "internal unrest." This attempt at a land blockade follows the failure of the military option. According to the newspaper, Washington’s pressure comes at a time when America’s regional allies had already expressed dissatisfaction regarding the joint U.S.-Israeli war against Iran that began in February a conflict that commenced despite warnings from these very nations and resulted in significant economic costs and physical damage to the region.

According to the report, following months of stalemate in the conflict, it was anticipated that the Trump administration would resume its attacks on Iran after the U.S. midterm elections; however, the sweeping victory of the Democrats in those elections altered the course of events. Some U.S. government officials, including Vice President J.D. Vance, have linked the Republicans' electoral defeat to public dissatisfaction with the war.

Source: AVA PRESS

Tags

Your Comment

You are replying to: .
captcha